Assessment Task 2: Marking Rubric
|
Criteria |
HD |
D |
C |
P |
F |
Maximum Marks |
Your Marks |
|
Describe mobile-based personalized services delivery platform for farmers and other users. |
Well-integrated description emphasizes all of the important points and covers all elements required concepts, technology framework, product(s), target market(s), location, and legal structure |
Well-integrated description emphasises most of the important points and covers all elements required concepts, technology framework, product(s), target market(s), location, and legal structure |
Description emphasises some of the important points and covers all elements required concepts, technology framework, product(s), target market(s), location, and legal structure |
Description emphasises one or two of the important points and / or covers most of the elements required concepts, technology framework, product(s), target market(s), location, and legal structure |
Description ignores most or all of the important points and does not cover all the elements required (concepts, technology framework, product(s), target market(s), location, and legal structure |
20 |
|
|
Calculate important factors like cost and timeliness, and benefit impact of the innovations. |
Well explained with exact figures |
Clearly explained all factors |
Mostly all factors explained |
At least half of the factors explained correctly |
At least half of the factors incorrect l or no working shown |
35 |
|
|
Comment on implementation challenges, replicability and future potential and scalability |
Well-integrated, first person commentary supported by clearly identified evidence |
Well-integrated first person commentary supported by some evidence |
First person commentary supported by some evidence |
First person commentary supported by little evidence |
Poorly articulated commentary with little or no supporting evidence |
15 |
|
|
Required format of report |
Required format followed in all respects |
Required format followed with one or two minor lapses |
Required format followed with a few minor lapses |
Required format followed in most respects, but one or two major lapses |
Little or no evidence of the required format |
10 |
|
|
Quality of written communication |
Well-crafted control of the conventions of academic writing to produce fluent argument that creates meaning and effect |
Control of conventions of academic writing to produce fluent argument that clearly conveys meaning |
Few minor lapses in control of the conventions of academic writing with few instances of impaired fluency |
Some minor lapses in control of the conventions of academic writing with some instances of impaired fluency |
Frequent lapses in control of the conventions of academic writing and grossly impaired fluency |
10 |
|
|
Consistent citation and referencing |
Comprehensive citation and appropriate referencing with consistent adherence to referencing conventions |
Comprehensive citation and appropriate referencing with few minor lapses in adherence to referencing conventions |
Few citation and / or referencing omissions, with few lapses in adherence to referencing conventions |
Some citation and / or referencing omissions and / or some lapses in adherence to referencing conventions |
Frequent citation and / or referencing omissions and / or frequent lapses in adherence to referencing conventions |
10 |
