![๐๐ก๐ฒ ๐๐ก๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐
๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐?
โ
๐
๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ: เคนเคพเคฎเฅ เคคเคชเคพเคเคเคเฅ เคตเคฟเคคเฅเคคเฅเคฏ เคตเคฟเคถเฅเคฒเฅเคทเคฃเคฒเคพเค เคธเคนเฅ เคฆเคฟเคถเคพ เคฆเคฟเคจเฅเคเฅเคโเคฌเคเฅเค, เคจเคเคฆ เคชเฅเคฐเคตเคพเคน, เคฐ เคเฅเคเคฟเคฎ เคฎเฅเคฒเฅเคฏเคพเคเฅเคเคจเคฎเคพ เคตเคฟเคถเฅเคทเคเฅเคเคคเคพเฅค
โ
๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ญ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ : เคคเคชเคพเคเคเคเฅ เคตเคฟเคคเฅเคคเฅเคฏ เคฒเคเฅเคทเฅเคฏเคนเคฐเฅ เคนเคพเคธเคฟเคฒ เคเคฐเฅเคจเคเคพ เคฒเคพเคเคฟ เค เฅเคธ เคฐ เคธเคเฅเค เคฌเคเฅเค เคฌเคจเคพเคเคจเฅเฅค
โ
๐
๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ : เคธเคนเฅ, เคชเคพเคฐเคฆเคฐเฅเคถเฅ, เคฐ เคธเคฎเคฏเคฎเฅ เคตเคฟเคคเฅเคคเฅเคฏ เคฐเคฟเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคเคฟเคเฅเค เคชเฅเคฐเคฃเคพเคฒเฅเคฎเคพ เคฎเคฆเฅเคงเคค เคเคฐเฅเคฆเคเฅเคเฅค
โ
๐
๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฒ: เคนเคพเคฎเฅ เคคเคชเคพเคเคเคฒเคพเค เคธเคนเฅ เคจเคฟเคตเฅเคถ เคฐเคฃเคจเฅเคคเคฟเคนเคฐเฅ เคเคจเฅเค เคเคฐเฅเคจ เคฐ เคฎเฅเคจเคพเคซเคพ เค
เคงเคฟเคเคคเคฎ เคเคฐเฅเคจ เคธเคนเคฏเฅเค เคเคฐเฅเคเฅเคเฅค
โ
๐
๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐ก๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐๐จ๐ ๐ฒ: เคตเคฟเคคเฅเคคเฅเคฏ เคธเคฟเคฆเฅเคงเคพเคจเฅเคค เคฐ เคตเฅเคฏเคพเคตเคนเคพเคฐเคฟเค เคคเคฐเคฟเคเคพเคฎเคพ เคฌเคฒเคฟเคฏเฅ เคชเคเคกเคผ เคฐเคพเคเฅเคเฅเคเฅค
โ
๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ ๐
๐ข๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ: เคนเคพเคฎเฅ เคคเคชเคพเคเคเคเฅ เคธเคฌเฅ เคตเคฟเคคเฅเคคเฅเคฏ เคธเคฎเคพเคงเคพเคจเคเฅ เคฒเคพเคเคฟ เคชเฅเคถเฅเคตเคฐ เคฎเคพเคฐเฅเคเคฆเคฐเฅเคถเคจ เคฐ เคธเคนเคพเคฏเคคเคพ เคชเฅเคฐเคฆเคพเคจ เคเคฐเฅเคเฅเคเฅค
๐Assignment Nepal โ
ๅฝก[ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง]ๅฝกโ
:
Tribhuvan University
Purbanchal University
Nepal Open University
British College
๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐๐:
Assignments, Essays, and Case Studies
Project Reports
Coding Tutorials
Business Proposals
๐ผ ๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐:
Undergraduate to Doctorate Levels
๐ก๏ธ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐:
Accurate and Plagiarism-Free Work
๐ฌ Support:
24x7 Support
๐ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ค ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฃ: โ โ โ
โ
โ โ โ
๐ชฉ ๐๐๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐: @assignment__nepal
๐
Facebook: www.facebook.com/assignmentnepal
Email: price@assignmentnepal.com
Website: www.assignmentnepal.com
#PlagiarismFree #StudyTips #NepalSupport #NewZealandAssignmentHelp #BritishCollege #GradeBooster #AssignmentNepalHelp](https://assignmentnepal.com/wp-content/plugins/instagram-feed/img/placeholder.png)
DEGREE PROGRAMME
Bachelor of Computer Science (Hons) CSC61504 โ OPERATING SYSTEMS
GROUP ASSIGNMENT (30%)
JANUARY 2025 SEMESTER
Module Learning Outcome (MLO 2) – Describe the structure and functionality of an operating system
Outcome
- Students will be able to display numeracy skills.
- Students are introduced to research elements and teamwork.
- Studentsโ communication skills will be evaluated.
Group Members
For this project, you will be working in groups of 5. Each person in the group will have a task to complete.
Objective
Critically analyze and evaluate the integration of memory management techniques, such as segmentation and dynamic memory allocation, with deadlock prevention strategies (e.g., resource allocation graphs and Banker’s algorithm). This assignment aims to promote a deeper understanding of how these techniques help optimize resource utilization and improve system reliability in modern operating systems.
Question:
“Evaluate the effectiveness of memory management strategies, including segmentation and dynamic memory allocation, when combined with deadlock prevention mechanisms like Resource Allocation Graphs and the Bankerโs Algorithm in optimizing system performance and reliability in modern operating systems.”
Task:
- Research and Literature Review:
- Identify and review at least eight recent research papers (published within the last five years) focusing on memory management and deadlock prevention strategies in operating systems.
- Summarize the findings and highlight key advancements and challenges presented in the papers.
- Critical Analysis:
- Compare the memory management techniques (segmentation and dynamic allocation) discussed in the research with traditional approaches.
- Analyze how Resource Allocation Graphs and the Bankerโs Algorithm have been adapted or improved in modern systems.
- Evaluate the synergy between memory management and deadlock prevention techniques in enhancing overall system performance.
- Report Preparation:
- Present findings in a structured report with the following sections:
- Abstract and Introduction
- Literature Review
- Critical Analysis
- Simulation/Case Study Results
- Discussion and Recommendations
- Conclusion
- Include visual representations (graphs, charts, tables) to support your analysis.
Expected Learning Outcomes
Develop the ability to critically assess and integrate advanced concepts in memory management and deadlock prevention.
-
- Demonstrate skills in evaluating the effectiveness of strategies through research and simulation.
- Formulate evidence-based conclusions and recommendations for system optimization.
Appendix I
Report must cover the following topics
|
Abstract |
A concise summary that presents the key points, findings, and conclusions in a brief paragraph. |
|
Background Study |
A brief overview of the theoretical, historical, and contextual foundations that support the project’s necessity and provide context for understanding its importance. |
|
Problem Statement |
The problem/issue. What you intend to investigate. |
|
Objectives |
A project objective should give a brief summary of the main elements, aims, and scope of the project. |
|
Literature Review |
What was already known about the topic. |
|
Methodology |
Describe the methods and approaches used to conduct the project, including any tools or technologies employed. |
|
Findings |
Present the findings of the project and discuss their implications. Include any data, graphs, or findings that support the project’s success. |
|
Conclusion |
Draw conclusions from your study and relate these to your reading of the literature. |
|
References |
A list of sources you have cited or consulted to support your research, including books, articles, websites, and other materials in APA 7 style. |
|
Format |
Font: Arial Size: 11pt (contents), 14pt (heading) Text alignment: Justify Spacing: 1.5 Language: English Language Report Length: Minimum 10 pages including cover page and report content |
Submission Requirements
- Submission through myTIMeS under Group Assignment section.
- Please take note that, the maximum size of the file accepted by myTIMeS is not more than 20MB. Therefore, please check your file size before the submission.
Important Notes
- Copying, cheating, attempts to cheat, plagiarism, and any other attempts to gain an unfair advantage in assessment result in to award 0 marks to all parties concerned.
- The Turnitin similarity index for this module is 20% overall and lesser than 5% from a single source excluding program source code.
- All the submitted documents will be cross-checked with other studentsโ reports in this current and previous semester. Therefore, any similarities rather that whatever is highlighted in (#2) will be considered as violating assessment rules and a Zero (0) mark will be given to all group members.
- Severe disciplinary action will be taken against those caught violating assessment rules in (#1).
- Submissions made within 72 hours after the deadline will have their marks capped at 80%.
- Submissions made between 72 hours and 7 days after the deadline will have their marks capped at 60%.
- Submissions made more than 7 days after the deadline will not be accepted, and a mark of zero will be awarded.
- Generate the Similarity Index of your report using Turnitin within myTIMeS. Submit the generated Similarity Index along with the final report through the myTIMeS platform.
Rubric for Assignment Report [60 Marks]
|
Criteria |
Beginning (0 โ 2 Marks) |
Developing (3 โ 5 Marks) |
Mastering (6 โ 7 Marks) |
Outstanding (8 โ 10 Marks) |
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
Literature Review |
Lacks relevant sources and critical evaluation. |
Mentions some sources but lacks critical analysis. |
Relevant sources reviewed with some critical insight. |
Comprehensive review of relevant sources with in-depth analysis. |
|
Critical Analysis |
Superficial comparison; limited evaluation and reasoning; little evidence of critical thinking. |
Basic comparison with limited evaluation; reasoning lacks depth; minimal critical thinking. |
Good comparison and evaluation; logical reasoning mostly sound; some original insights; adequate critical thinking. |
In-depth comparison and evaluation of techniques; strong logical reasoning; highly original insights; evidence of critical thinking in linking findings to system performance. |
|
Report Structure and Content |
Poorly organized; sections incomplete or poorly written; unclear or irrelevant visuals; lacks professionalism. |
Adequately organized; some sections underdeveloped; flow occasionally disrupted; visuals are basic or partially relevant. |
Well-organized and professional; most sections developed; logical flow; visuals mostly clear and relevant. |
Highly organized and professional; all sections well-developed; clear and logical flow; visuals enhance understanding. |
|
Originality and Insights |
Minimal originality or insights; recommendations are vague or impractical. |
Some originality but limited insights; recommendations are generic or basic. |
Good originality and insights; recommendations are practical and relevant. |
Exceptional originality in analysis and insights; provides innovative perspectives and meaningful recommendations. |
|
References |
No references or improperly formatted. |
Some references, but improperly formatted or incomplete. |
All references provided but with minor formatting issues. |
All references properly formatted, complete, and relevant to the study. |
