BPP Business School Coursework Cover Sheet
Please use this document as the cover sheet of for the 1st page of your assessment. Please complete the below table – the grey columns
| Module Name | Personal Effectiveness |
| Programme Name | |
| Student Reference Number (SRN) | |
| Assessment Title |
Please complete the yellow sections in the below declaration :
Related Post
| Declaration of Original Work: I hereby declare that I have read and understood BPP’s regulations on plagiarism and that this is my original work,researched, undertaken, completed and submitted in accordance with the requirements of BPP School of Business and Technology. The word count, excluding contentstable, bibliography and appendices, is ______ words. Student Reference Number: __________ Date: ______ |
By submitting this coursework you agree to all rules and regulations of BPP regarding assessments and awards for programmes.
Please note that by submitting this assessment you are declaring that you are fit to sit this assessment.
BPP University reserves the right to use all submitted work for educational purposes and may request that work be published for a wider audience.
MSc Management
Personal Effectiveness
Coursework Assessment Brief
Submission mode: Turnitin online access
1. General Assessment Guidance
• Your formative assessment for this module is made up of this coursework submission. This submission is not graded. You will only receive written feedback for this submission to help you improve your work in the summative.
• Please note late submissions will not be marked.
• You are required to submit all elements of your assessment via Turnitin online access. Only submissions made via the specified mode will be accepted and hard copies or any other digital form of submissions (like via email or pen drive etc.) will not be accepted.
• For this formative, the submission word limit is 800 words (Task 1 only). You must comply with the word count guidelines. You may submit an introduction but this is optional. Word Count guidelines can be found on your programme home page and the coursework submission page.
• Do not put your name or contact details anywhere on your submission. You should only put your student registration number (SRN) which will ensure your submission is recognised in the marking process.
• You are required to use only Harvard Referencing System in your submission. Any content which is already published by other author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of plagiarism.
You can find further information on Harvard Referencing in the online library on the VLE. You can use the following link to access this information: http://bpp.libguides.com/Home/StudySupport • BPP University has a strict policy regarding authenticity of assessments. In proven instances of plagiarism or collusion, severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to read the rules and regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion in the GARs and MOPP which are available on VLE in the Academic registry section.
• You should include a completed copy of the Assignment Cover sheet. Any submission without this completed Assignment Cover sheet may be considered invalid and not marked.
2. Assessment Brief
The required submission for this assignment is a 800 words (plus 200 word introduction optional) “Personal Effectiveness Report”.
Students are required to complete one tasks:
1. Reflect on your own skill set in relation to a career goal.
The Learning Outcomes to successfully pass this assessment are:
(LO2) Appraise the key skills and behaviours required to be effective in a professional context.
TASK 1
a) Using a model of reflective practice, reflect on a task that you completed at work or university to identify your own skill set. Identify both your strengths and weaknesses.
b) Analyse the skills you identified with reference to your choice of career or job.
N.B. To support your answer, you should refer to the reflective model by Gibbs or Schön and additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles on wider leadership concepts and personal effectiveness from the online library.
(This task meets LO2)
(Total marks for Task 1: 35% weighting)
Structure
Your Personal Effectiveness report should contain the following:
• BPP assignment cover sheet (including SRN and word count) • Personal Effectiveness report title page
• Contents page
• Introduction (200 words)
• Task 1 (800 words)
• References (Correct Harvard Referencing applied throughout, including in-text citation and reference list)
• Appendices (if required)
• Glossary (optional)
3. Marking Guide
| Assessment task | 0-29% 30-39% Fail | 40-49% Low Fail | 50-59% Pass | 60-69% Merit | 70-79% 80-100% Distinction | |||
| Task 1 (35% weighting, LO2) | Inadequate reflection with little or no clarity and precision in identifying personal skill set. Fails to use a reflective model effectively. Does not identify both strengths and weaknesses. Inadequate analysis of skills with little or no clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. Fails to reference the choice of career effectively. | Weak reflection with limited clarity in identifying personal skill set. Applies a reflective model but with limited depth. Identifies some strengths and weaknesses with limited analysis. Weak analysis of skills with limited clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. Makes some reference to the choice of career but with limited depth. | Limited reflection with some clarity in identifying personal skill set. Applies a reflective model effectively to some extent. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses but lacks depth in analysis. Limited analysis of skills with some clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career but lacks depth in analysis. | Satisfactory reflection with explicit identification of personal skill set. Applies a reflective model effectively. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with a satisfactory level of depth and analysis. Satisfactory analysis of skills with explicit links to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career effectively with a satisfactory level of depth and analysis. | Good reflection with clear identification of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model effectively. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with depth and clarity in analysis. Good analysis of skills with clear and coherent links to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career effectively with depth and clarity in analysis. | Excellent reflection with a deep and balanced understanding of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model exceptionally well. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses comprehensively with exceptional depth and precision. Excellent analysis of skills with a thorough understanding of their relevance to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career comprehensively with exceptional depth and precision in analysis. | Outstanding reflection with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model with outstanding depth and coherence. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with exceptional clarity and coherence. Outstanding analysis of skills with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of their direct application to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career with exceptional clarity and coherence in analysis. | |
| Presentation (10% weighting) | Inadequate references with inconsistencies, errors or omissions. Limited structure and expression. | Weak references but may contain inconsistencies, errors or omissions. Limited structure and expression. | Limited references with errors or inconsistencies. Limited structure and expression. | Satisfactory with full and appropriate references. Satisfactory structured layout and mainly accurate expression. | Good with precise, full and appropriate references. Well-structured layout and professional and accurate expression. | Excellent with precise, full and appropriate references. Excellent structured layout and professional and accurate expression. | Outstanding with precise, full and appropriate references. Outstanding structured layout and professional and accurate expression. | |
