HR5065NI Talent Resourcing and Development Islington College

London Metropolitan University | Personal Website of Kevin Mears

COURSEWORK QUESTION PAPER: 1st sit

Autumn 2023 Semester-long

Module Code:	HR5065NI
Module Title:	Talent Resourcing and Development
Module Leader:	Shilpa Dhakal (Islington College)

Coursework Type:	Group presentation 15 minutesGroup report 2000 words
Coursework Weight:	This coursework accounts for 100% of your total module grades.
Submission Date:	TBA
When Coursework is given out:	TBA
Submission Instructions:	Submit the following at the MST Platform before the due date. The submission should be on a single PDF file and the naming conventions should be as shown below- 1xPDF file File name: 12312324 Dhruva John.
Warning:	London Metropolitan University and Islington College take Plagiarism seriously. Offenders will be dealt with sternly.

Please read the following carefully

Section A: Learning outcome of the assessment

LO1 The capacity to contribute to the effective development, implementation, review, improvement and manipulation of appropriate HRM and people management methods and policies in specific organisational contexts;

LO 2. Knowledge and understanding of the relations between business strategy, structure and culture and the management of people, and their particular implications for HR managing the organisational need for talent and the ways in which HR may contribute to organisational performance;

LO 3.An understanding of the importance of a systematic approach to people management, the role, benefits and drawbacks of HR Planning and the integration between this and other HR policies, notably recruitment, selection, performance management, retention and release with a view to building long term organisational performance;

LO 4.The ability to critically analyse and evaluate the formulation and implementation of processes of learning and talent development strategies for defining and achieving current and future effectiveness at national, organisational, group and individual levels;

Section B: Introduction

The module has one summative component with two tasks. The students need to work in a group and work on a group presentation and group report on the same topic.

The assessment includes following two tasks:

Task 001: 50% Group Presentation- Development of HR plan

Task 002: 50% Group Report- Development of HR plan

Section C: Assessment Strategy

Students need to form the group of 3 to work to develop the HR plan of the organisation mentioned below:

List of Organisation

Zappos
Mayo Clinic
LinkedIN
Hyatt
H&M
Marriot
Turkish Airlines
Chaudhary group
Unilever
Standard Chartered
Crown Plaza
Axiata

The group needs to be formed by week 03 and communicated with the module lecturer. This group will continue working together throughout the semester to work on the assessment (group presentation and group report)

There are two tasks to be completed for this assessment. Both tasks require you to access the secondary data for the work.

Task 001

50% Group Presentation- Development of HR Plan

Prepare a 15-minutes group presentation on Development of HR Plan followed by Q&A session.
This presentation will be evaluated based on the group performance as well as individual performance.

After finalising the organisation, the group needs to develop the presentation covering the following aspect of the HR plan.

Company profile and reason for choosing the company
Analysis of Organisational Plans and Objectives
Analysis of Human Resources Inventory
Assessing Future Supply and Demand
Matching Supply and Demand
Establishing an Action Plan using the two HR theories or concepts learned in the module

A few of recommended theories that can be used for the work, but not limited to:

Employee recruitment & onboarding
Payroll, tax & benefits administrations
Handle discipline and termination
Conduct ongoing employee training and development
Succession Planning
Support engagement, health and wellness programs and other relevant HR concepts

Task 002

50% Group Report- Development of HR Plan

After getting the feedback from the presentation, the group needs to continue working to develop the group report on the same topic.

The group needs to prepare a report covering the development of the HR Plan of the organisation that was selected in task 01.

The word count of this report is 2000 words ( report 1550 words and personal reflection of each member count of 150 words). Each member needs to submit a personal reflection essay, with 150 words. The personal reflection essay will be counted as individual performance.

As you have identified the two theories from HR for Task 001, you need to also add the concept of performance management for Task 002.

The report should cover the following

Company profile and reason for choosing the company
Analysis of Organisational Plans and Objectives
Analysis of Human Resources Inventory
Assessing Future Supply and Demand
Matching Supply and Demand
Establishing an Action Plan using the THREE HR theories or concepts learned in the module(Including performance management)
Self-Reflection (Each group members 150 words) about the module.

A few of recommended theories that can be used for the work, but not limited to:

Performance management (Mandatory)
Employee recruitment & onboarding
Payroll, tax & benefits administrations
Handle discipline and termination
Conduct ongoing employee training and development
Succession Planning
Support engagement, health and wellness programs and other relevant HR concepts

All the group members will be given the same mark for the report except the self-reflection.

Section D: Assessment submission

Use the correct cover page and name convention to submit the file to MST.

Make sure you clearly write the group name when submitting the files. See the cover page of this assessment for the sample.

Task 001: 50% Group Presentation

On behalf of the group, one member must submit the final slide and the group declaration to RTE to participate in the group presentation. The date of the presentation will be provided by the module lecturers 48 hours before the planned date.

Each presentation should last exactly 15 minutes. The presentation will be followed by the Q&A session.

Task 002: 50% Group Report

On behalf of the group, one member must submit the final report and the group declaration to RTE.

Word count for the report (Total 2000 words)

HR Plan – 1550 +/- 10% words
Self-Reflection for each member- 150 words

All reflection essays of the group members should be compiled together in the same report rather than submitting them individually.

Section E: Marking Criteria: How will you be evaluated?

For Task 001, Group Presentation

The grade will be awarded based on the following marking Criteria for Group Presentation.

Understanding the given task
Content Presented
Critical Analysis
Structure
Conclusion
Use of relevant and accurate evidence
Use of relevant and accurate academics theories
Presentation Skill
Time Management
Group Skill
Question and Answer – Individually marked
Citation and Referencing

For Task 002, Group Report

The grade will be awarded based on the following marking Criteria for a written report as group.

Understanding the given task
Content Presented
Critical Analysis
Structure
Conclusion
Use of relevant and accurate evidence
Use of relevant and accurate academics theories
Writing Skill
Word limits
Citation and Referencing
Personal Reflection – Individually marked
Formatting (Arial, Font Size: 12, Line Spacing 1.5)

Section F: Recommended Table of contents

Task 001 50% Group Presentation	Task 002 50% Group Report
Introduction to the Presentation (Aims and purpose)	Introduction to the Report (Aims and purpose)
Analysis of Organisational Plans and Objectives	Analysis of Organisational Plans and Objectives
Preparing a Human Resources Inventory	Preparing a Human Resources Inventory
Assessing Future Supply and Demand	Assessing Future Supply and Demand
Matching Supply and Demand	Matching Supply and Demand
Establishing an Action Plan using the two theories	Establishing an Action Plan using the three theories
Conclusion	Conclusion
Q n A	Self-Reflection
Reference	References
Submission of group declaration form	Appendix
	Submission of group declaration form

Section G: Recommended Reading for references

Taylor, S. (2018) Resourcing and talent management, (7th edition), London, CIPD
Marchington, M. & Wilkinson, A. (2012) Human Resource Management at Work, (5th edition), London, CIPD
Stewart, J. & Rigg, C. (2011) Learning & Talent Development, London, CIPD
Company Website
Trusted third-party website

Section H: Assessment Grade Description

GSBL UNDERGRADUATEGENERAL GRADE DESCRIPTORS

	Level 3/4	Level 5	Level 6
General	Acquisition of broad knowledgeEvaluate informationUse information to plan, develop and problem solve	Generate ideas through analysing conceptsDemonstrate a command of specialised skillsFormulate responses to well defined and abstractAnalyse and evaluate information	Critically review, consolidate and extend a body of knowledge using specialised skillsCritically evaluate concepts and evidence from a range of sourcesTransfer and apply skills and exercise significant judgement in a range of situations
70-100 (A)	Very goodDemonstration of very good comprehension of the task with evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisalUse of a wide variety of appropriate sourcesTransformation of knowledgeIndependent thinking and development of ideasAbility to communication very clearly and effectivelyVery good evidence of preparationVery good organisation, structure and presentation of work – minimal errorsGood references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). No errors in reference list or citations.	ExcellentAdvanced scholarshipGoes beyond the material providedExcellent link to researchExcellent analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisalExcellent evidence of preparationComprehensive and critical understanding of the topicExcellent ability to communicate clearly and effectivelyExcellent organisation, structure and presentation of workGood references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). No errors in reference list or citations.	Excellent – Outstanding (for use at far end of range)Outstanding understanding, exploration and insightStrong evidence of originality and development of own ideasDevelop a highly complex argumentOutstanding ability to communicate topics clearly and conciselyAdvanced organisation, structure and presentation of workGood references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). No errors in reference list or citations.References well utilised and critiqued
60-69 (B)	Very goodDemonstration of very good comprehension of the task with evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluationUse of a wide variety of appropriate sourcesTransformation of knowledgeIndependent thinking and development of ideasAbility to communication clearly and effectivelyVery good evidence of preparationVery good organisation, structure and presentation of work – minimal errorsGood references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). Minimal or no errors in reference list or citations.	Very goodDemonstration of very good comprehension of the task with evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluationUse of a wide variety of appropriate sourcesTransformation of knowledgeIndependent thinking and development of ideasAbility to communication clearly and effectivelyVery good evidence of preparationVery good organisation, structure and presentation of work – minimal errorsGood references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). Minimal or no errors in reference list or citations.	Very GoodAdvanced scholarshipGoes beyond the material providedVery good link to researchVery good analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisalVery good evidence of preparationComprehensive and critical understanding of the topicVery good ability to communicate clearly and effectivelyVery good organisation, structure and presentation of workGood references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). No errors in reference list or citations.
50-59 (C)	Adequate – SatisfactorySome analysis but limitedSome insight and exploration of ideasSound conclusionsNo significant inaccuracies or omissionsSome analysis, evaluation or synthesis of informationLacking clarity at timesSome evidence of preparationReferencing is sound. Mostly appropriate sources. Numerous errors or inconsistencies	Adequate – SatisfactorySome evidence of thinking independently to develop own ideasEvaluation of relevant theories or literatureReasonable ability to communicate clearly and effectivelyReport information in a structured wayUse of an appropriate formatQuite comprehensive knowledgeSatisfactory evidence of preparationSatisfactory referencing, appropriate sources.Numerous but minor errors in references	Adequate- SatisfactoryEvidence of thinking independently to develop own ideasEvaluation of relevant theories or literatureAbility to communicate clearly and effectivelyReport information in a structured wayUse of an appropriate formatReasonably Accurate, quite comprehensive knowledgeSatisfactory evidence of preparationCoherent and well presented – minor errorsSatisfactory referencing, appropriate sources.Minor errors in references
40-49 (D)	All learning outcomes metCompetent (practical)May be incomplete in knowledge (some errors or omissions)Insufficient analysis, evaluation or synthesisLimited application of theories/knowledgeAn awareness of appropriate principles/theories/techniquesIrrelevance to the task at timesDisorganised work with weak standard of presentationNumerous aberrations from the requirements of the taskReferencing is attempted although may be inconsistent, many errors, weak sources	All learning outcomes metCompetent (practical)May be incomplete in knowledge (some errors or omissions)Weak or no analysis, evaluation or synthesisSome application of theories/knowledgeAn awareness of appropriate principles/theories/techniquesIrrelevance to the task at timesDisorganised work with weak standard of presentationAberrations from the requirements of the taskReferencing is attempted although may be inconsistent, many errors, weak sources	All learning outcomes metCompetent (practical)May be incomplete in knowledge (some errors or omissions)Weak or no analysis, evaluation or synthesisSome application of theories/knowledgeAn awareness of appropriate principles/theories/techniquesIrrelevance to the task at timesDisorganised work with weak standard of presentationAberrations from the requirements of the taskReferencing is attempted although may be inconsistent, many errors, weak sources
Condoned Pass 30-39 (R2/F1)	Learning outcomes not metLittle relevant knowledgeLacking structureNumerous errors in structure and formLimited understanding of concepts/theoriesNo appropriate analysis, evaluation or synthesisSignificant inaccuracies/omissionsNot competentLittle or no attempt to use references and if so very weak with errors	Learning outcomes not metLittle relevant knowledgeLacking structureNumerous errors in structure and formLimited understanding of concepts/theoriesNo appropriate analysis, evaluation or synthesisSignificant inaccuracies/omissionsNot competentLittle or no attempt to use references and if so very weak with errors	Learning outcomes not metLittle relevant knowledgeLacking structureNumerous errors in structure and formLimited understanding of concepts/theoriesNo appropriate analysis, evaluation or synthesisSignificant inaccuracies/omissionsNot competentLittle or no attempt to use references and if so very weak with errors
Under 30 (R2/F2)	Little engagement with the taskNo basic understanding of the subject matterPoor communication (written or verbal)Lacking or no structureSignificant errors in structure and formMany significant inaccuracies/omissions – very little correctLittle or no attempt to use references and if so very weak with many significant errors	Little engagement with the taskNo basic understanding of the subject matterPoor communication (written or verbal)Lacking or no structureSignificant errors in structure and formMany significant inaccuracies/omissions – very little correctLittle or no attempt to use references and if so very weak with many significant errors	Little engagement with the taskNo basic understanding of the subject matterPoor communication (written or verbal)Lacking or no structureSignificant errors in structure and formMany significant inaccuracies/omissions – very little correctLittle or no attempt to use references and if so very weak with many significant errors
(0%)	No submissionNothing of relevance in the work submitted	No submissionNothing of relevance in the work submitted	No submissionNothing of relevance in the work submitted